Leave a message, a hug or anything. Lots of love, Ariel ;)
Date | Thu-11-07 |
Message | yeah, i agree with what you said in your last post. anyway tomorrow is the last day of lessons so YAY! |
Date | Wed-11-07 |
Message | 2C chalet, 2C Chalet! Send me your schedule ASAP! |
Date | Sun-10-07 |
Message | Your grades, are still a hell lot better than mine. & i'm super lookin forward to 2C chalet! |
Date | Sun-10-07 |
Message | oh my god i realised i typed for so damn long. but i still have more to say. in jobs where you require very practical physics skills like engineering, if you realise by now the pay is actually not as high as you think it is. furthermore, you require to study alot and very long. nowadays less ppl want to be engineers. and the most practical job for the person with the most knowledgeable set of practical information i can think of is being a teacher. now would you like to be exactly like your secondary school teacher? i think not even if you choose subjs like physics, you need to excel in it...be real good at it, before you can actually become successful. what's the point of taking geography if you're going to fail it anyway? might as well take art if you constantly top it. being a famous fashion designer makes the big bucks roll in too. but just because everyone takes physics, is everyone going to become a successful engineer in the future? on the contrary, with so many ppl choosing to specialise in those subjs, there will be even more competition. this is a world of infinite possiblities. some people seriously need to rethink their options. |
Date | Sun-10-07 |
Message | i think that most (i'm not saying all) humans students are normally (again this is another generalisation) better at analytical skills... and chosing a subject like history sets you apart from the crowd because you chose to do something different. most ppl think that geog is practical, but is it really? the only time you would ever apply your geog skills is probably when you're lost in some jungle or you're a pilot. if you go out to the real world, it doesn't matter whether you're taking geog or hist or lit. as long as you're a talent, whichever subj you excel in does not matter because everyone would be snatching you up and offering high paying jobs then again, if you're really THAT talented, you wouldn't need to take shit from that somebody above. you can rely on your own skills to invent something that is copyrighted to you intellectual property sells for the most, don't you agree? in jobs where you deal with intagible goods, the returns tend to be greater. it's like selling intelligence. let's take microsoft for eg, it's like selling an invention, which is derived from some special qualities in bill gates which is probably very abstract. it's an acquired skill/talent and it very obviously does not come with physics or geography. if you are a politician, then you are selling your visionary ideas and leadership skills. if you are a lawyer, then you are selling your persuasion skills. P.S It's intellectual property, not practical property |
Date | Sat-10-07 |
Message | And history allowed you to discover the wonderful existence of MIKE STRANK right? Hee! If I had a choice, I would've taken history too. Ok actually I DO have a choice. I am kind of considering between history and e-lit now. E-lit like suddenly alot of people want to take, and some people include. Ok, include the cough not-so-nice ones. Whoo..That's like the longest tag I've tagged you before! Haha |
Date | Sat-10-07 |
Message | HAHAHA. ur last post totally cracked me up. i really hope we will be in the same lt for maths! |
Date | Sat-10-07 |
Message | HAHA. our mommies are all very much retarded |
Date | Thu-10-07 |
Message | your peeko |
Date | Thu-10-07 |
Message | ARIEL! LALALA! thanks for helping me into thimun! woooo. |